Smt. Selvi & Ors.  V.  State of Karnataka

Smt. Selvi & Ors. V. State of Karnataka

Narco Analysis Test Cannot Be Forcibly Conducted On An Individual: Supreme Court Held In Selvi V. State Of Karnataka [2010]

The Uttar Pradesh Government has reportedly ordered to conduct polygraphic and narco analysis test on the accused, victim’s relatives and even police officers involved in the probe. This piece intends to examine the legality of ‘ordering’ narco analysis test in the light of a Supreme Court judgment delivered a decade ago in Selvi vs. State Of Karnataka.

 In Selvi, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court observed that the compulsory administration of the techniques like analysis tests constitutes ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’ in the context of Article 21. In conclusion, the court held that no individual should be forcibly subjected to such tests, whether in the context of investigation in criminal cases or otherwise, as the same would amount to an unwarranted intrusion into personal liberty. It was also held that such techniques cannot be read into the statutory provisions which enable medical examination during investigation in criminal cases, i.e. the Explanation to Sections 53, 53-A and 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The court, however, observed that voluntary administration of such techniques in the context of criminal justice is permissible, provided that certain safeguards are in place. “Even when the subject has given consent to undergo any of these tests, the test results by themselves cannot be admitted as evidence because the subject does not exercise conscious control over the responses during the administration of the test. However, any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntary administered test results can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.”, the court clarified.

The judgment finally reproduced ‘Guidelines for the Administration of Polygraph Test (Lie 249 Detector Test) on an Accused’ published by National Human Rights Commission and directed that they should be strictly adhered to and similar safeguards should be adopted for conducting the ‘Narcoanalysis technique’ and the ‘Brain Electrical Activation Profile’ test.

(i). No Lie Detector  Tests should be administered except on the basis of consent of the accused. An option should be given to the accused whether he wishes to avail such test.

(ii).If the accused volunteers for a Lie Detector Test, he should be given access to a lawyer and the physical, emotional and legal implication of such a test should be explained to him by the police and his lawyer.

(iii). The consent should be recorded before a Judicial Magistrate.

(IV).During the hearing before the Magistrate, the person alleged to have agreed should be duly represented by a lawyer.

(v). At the hearing, the person in question should also be told in clear terms that the statement that is made shall not be a ‘confessional’ statement to the Magistrate but will have the status of a statement made to the police.

(vi). The Magistrate shall consider all factors relating to the detention including the length of detention and the nature of the interrogation.

(vii). The actual recording of the Lie Detector Test shall be done by an independent agency (such as a hospital) and conducted in the presence of a lawyer.

(viii). A full medical and factual narration of the manner of the information received must be taken on record.

When one reads the judgment holistically, the above guidelines are applicable to conduct tests on victims as well.

This content is developed in association with Laxopedia.

8 thoughts on “Smt. Selvi & Ors. V. State of Karnataka

  1. I’m usually to blogging and i actually admire your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your web site and maintain checking for brand spanking new information.

  2. One more thing I would like to state is that in lieu of trying to accommodate all your online degree programs on times that you finish work (because most people are drained when they get back), try to obtain most of your instructional classes on the week-ends and only one or two courses in weekdays, even if it means a little time away from your saturday and sunday. This pays off because on the saturdays and sundays, you will be extra rested and concentrated with school work. Many thanks for the different points I have learned from your blog site.

  3. Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I want to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article?however what can I say?I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get one thing done.

  4. I haven抰 checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I抣l add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  5. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. But just imagine if you added some great graphics or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this website could definitely be one of the most beneficial in its field. Wonderful blog!

  6. I was just looking for this information for a while. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your website. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this kind of informative web sites in top of the list. Generally the top sites are full of garbage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!